Locations where I could easily hit 70 Mbit/s on 5Ghz would crawl to 35/22 range. I used a pair of iPhone 5's which I would switch between 2.4 & 5Ghz Bands as well as a 4S on the 2.4Ghz Band, among other devices. I wasn't expecting the TC to beat the ASUS, but at least stay close, particularly with mobiles devices on the network. Faster by a few Megabytes then my ASUS.įor the life of me, I can't figure out why the router was doing so poorly in certain locations where the Asus would trump it. I was achieving roughly 28MB/s on average between a wired Windows 8 Desktop to a 2010 MacBook Pro 13" (OSX 10.8.4) on the 5Ghz band within three feet of the router. Speeds were consistent and network transfer never failed (unlike the prior Extreme) and were also pretty consistent. ![]() Performance was initially poorer then I was hoping for, but it was certainly working normally. I unfortunately have no 802.11AC based devices, so my experience was purely based off 802.11N on a combination of 2.4/5Ghz ranges. Great router, but I always had great experiences with AirPort models, so I bit the bullet for fun to check this new one out. I did comparison tests against my current/previous router I was using, the Asus N66U. Apparently, this was occurring to some individuals, so I returned the day after and replaced it with a Time Capsule seeing as they no longer had any Extremes left to exchange.ĭidn't care much for the hard drive, but eh, over the air back-ups sounded convenient, if not overpriced imho. It was terribly inconsistent, regardless of the restores/reboots or devices I used. I purchased the Extreme a bit over two weeks ago and did quite a bit of non-professional testing (, or moving files around the network at different points throughout my home) and came to realization that my particular model was defective. If it was the update that was posted on July 11th (6.3.1), then no, unfortunately. All of that, at the end of the day, does not matter if the router can't do the basic thing I require which is to provide reliable network access. I say sadly because otherwise the router is very nice, offering a clean design and great range. Sadly this router is not ready for prime time. Swapped back in my old Netgear 3700 and all the problems went away. but I would run into problems getting connected again the next time I tried to start the connection. I would get it running through a combination of resetting the NIC on the Thinkpad, restarting network services, etc. With the Airport I was having all sorts of problems getting this connection to work. ![]() I connect to the corporate network from home using Juniper SSL VPN. The real deal breaker though were problems I experienced with my employer provided T420 Thinkpad. Even setting a long DHCP timer on the Airport did not resolve this. ![]() I also had a problem with a Samsung tablet in which it (running a security app) would periodically get disconnected from the network and then reconnect. Resetting the router resulted in services working again on wi-fi. On two separate occasions the router wi-fi "locked up" and while devices showed connected, no packets were routed out to the Internet. Now, as to the actual problems I experienced with this router. ![]() I was really surprised that they did not support it. While QoS is something most users will never mess around with, it is a pretty common thing for advanced users to need from a "top shelf" SOHO router.ĭynDNS though? LOTS of people need DynDNS support for things as simple as basic port forwarding of a service on their home network to the internet (security cameras, etc). In my case I was baffled that the router did not offer the capability to configure QoS or even something as simple as DynDNS. Obviously for more advanced users the various Apple limitations on router configuration are a hindrance. I recently purchased this router, but a variety of issues have left me ready to return it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |